Publications
Stay up to date with our literature reviews which are curated by experts to feature the most important publications released each month. Explore our publications for access to concise summary slides for your own use.
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Use and the Effects of Empagliflozin on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Admitted for Acute Heart Failure: Findings from EMPULSE
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023; online ahead of print DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2982
In the EMPULSE trial, empagliflozin produced greater clinical benefit than placebo in patients hospitalised for AHF. Although many patients with AHF are treated with MRAs, the interplay between empagliflozin and MRAs in AHF has not been explored. A post-hoc analysis of the EMPULSE trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin versus placebo according to MRA use at baseline.
Keywords:
Effects of Empagliflozin on Symptoms, Physical Limitations and Quality of Life in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure – Results From the EMPULSE Trial
Circulation 2022; online ahead of print doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059725
This post hoc and prespecified analysis of the EMPULSE trial found that initiation of empagliflozin in patients hospitalised for acute heart failure (AHF) produced clinical benefit regardless of the degree of symptomatic impairment at baseline. Empagliflozin also improved symptoms, physical limitations, and quality of life – with benefits seen as early as 15 days and maintained through 90 days.
The SGLT2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin in Patients Hospitalized For Acute Heart Failure: A Multinational Randomized Trial
Nature Med 2022;28:568–74 doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01659-1
Empagliflozin is well tolerated in patients hospitalised for acute heart failure, resulting in significant clinical benefit 90 days after treatment initiation.
Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
N Engl J Med 2017;377:1228–39 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612917
The EXSCEL study showed that among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with or without previous cardiovascular (CV) disease, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) did not differ significantly between patients who received exenatide and those who received placebo.